Nadir CD4 T cell count as predictor and high CD4 T cell intrinsic apoptosis as final mechanism of poor CD4 T cell recovery in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients: clinical implications.
See all publications
Nadir CD4 T cell count as predictor and high CD4 T cell intrinsic apoptosis as final mechanism of poor CD4 T cell recovery in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients: clinical implications.
Background: Although antiretroviral therapy improves immune response, some human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients present unsatisfactory CD4 T cell recovery despite achieving viral suppression, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality.
Methods: Cross-sectional, case-control study to characterize the mechanism and to identify predictive factors of poor immune response. We included 230 patients who were receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy and who had a viral load 50 copies/mL for >2 years; 95 were "discordant" (case patients; CD4 T cell count always 350 cells/microL), and 135 were "concordant" (control subjects). Activation markers, CD4 T cell death (necrosis, intrinsic apoptosis, and extrinsic apoptosis), and caspase-3 were measured. Clinical parameters, particularly antiretroviral combinations, were correlated with immune recovery.
Results: Discordant patients showed higher levels of activation markers, mainly in CD4 T cells (p .001), and higher rates of spontaneous cell death (P .001). Rates of activation and rates of CD4 T cell death (mainly by intrinsic apoptosis) were the best predictive factors for immune recovery, along with nadir CD4 T cell count. Patients who were receiving a protease inhibitor-based regimen were more likely to be discordant and showed higher rates of activation (P= .011), higher rates of CD4 T cell death (P = .033), and a lower nadir CD4 T cell count (P .001). Multivariate analysis, however, ruled out any effect of protease inhibitors on immune recovery. No differences were observed between the use of tenofovir-emtricitabine (Truvada) and the use of abacavir-lamivudine (Kivexa).
Conclusion: Discordant patients showed higher levels of activation markers, mainly in CD4 T cells (p .001), and higher rates of spontaneous cell death (P .001). Rates of activation and rates of CD4 T cell death (mainly by intrinsic apoptosis) were the best predictive factors for immune recovery, along with nadir CD4 T cell count. Patients who were receiving a protease inhibitor-based regimen were more likely to be discordant and showed higher rates of activation (P= .011), higher rates of CD4 T cell death (P = .033), and a lower nadir CD4 T cell count (P .001). Multivariate analysis, however, ruled out any effect of protease inhibitors on immune recovery. No differences were observed between the use of tenofovir-emtricitabine (Truvada) and the use of abacavir-lamivudine (Kivexa).